Monday, March 26, 2012

politics and methodology: alternative teaching resources

"Pyramid of Capitalist System"
We at Anti-Mankiw are no strangers to the idea that politics shapes economists' theories about how the world works. Unlike Mankiw, who regularly asserts in his textbook an ideal-type of "observation, theory, observation" method of economic science, the fact of the matter is that how we view the world often shapes our evaluation of the facts of that world.

Perhaps in no other place in economic theory is this fact more true, and thus more dangerous, than in the Marxian vs. non-Marxian (or neoclassical) theory of distribution. When Marx argued that the source of all wealth is the laborer and that surplus value, or profits, were taken from the laborer by the capitalist, neoclassical economists replied with a theory of distribution asserting that capital earns its fare share of the output, too.

The neoclassical response in the late 1800s offered a new theory, or new way of looking at the world. This subsequently helped shape how all neoclassical economists thought about the source of profits: instead of seeing them as fundamentally sourced from workers, these economists saw capital and entrepreneurs simply getting their fair share of the pie -- represented by the marginal price of capital multiplied by the marginal physical product of capital, or the value added by capitalists to production. This victory was a major one for capitalists because it essentially legitimated their control/monopoly over the means of production, which is really the main role capitalists play.

No more explanation for all the profit was necessary! And the political consequences were indeed severe. For one, the neoclassical response to Marx came in the 1870s, when labor militancy across Western Europe and America was reacting to a rapidly growing capitalist power in politics and the workplace. And the political victory is felt even up to today: even when compensation starts to be outstripped by worker productivity as it did in the 1970s, neoclassical economists could simply ignore it because in their baseline model, workers get what they put in, and so does capital. The rest was just minor details.

Why do we mention this now? Because Fred Moseley from Mount Holyoke College has written an excellent introduction to the neoclassical theory of distribution as well as some ways to critique it for an introductory- or intermediate-level class. Find it here. We highly recommend checking it out and trying it out in your own classes!

5 comments:

  1. Hello!
    Join the largest system of making money and get $ 10 to test the system!
    Visit us and attend conferences 24h/7days, get all your questions and see how everyone is happy!
    No system is pyramid or multi-level and already has over 400,000 members!
    We are waiting for you!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I highly recommend you to visit this blog for the topic about labour theory of value versus the marginalist theory: http://kapitalism101.wordpress.com/


    This is where the economic struggle begins.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Excellent to be visiting your blog again, it has been months for me. Rightly, this article that I've been served for therefore long. I want this article to finish my assignment within the faculty, and it has the same topic together with your article. Thanks for the ton of valuable help, nice share. blog writing

    ReplyDelete
  4. shopecocbd are a specialized supplier of 100% organic CBD products for people and pets, our products are produced from plants in Europe. Our products are manufactured under laboratory supervision. Through these laboratory studies, we remain within the legal standards for the production of our CBD oil, which means that the 0.2% THC content is not exceeded.

    Our mission is to offer a 100% organic product at a fair price that can offer you and your beloved pets any health benefits. We do not make health claims, if you have health problems, always communicate with your health practitioner. In our blog we spread the word with up to date information about eventual cbd benefiths and legalization.

    ReplyDelete
  5. A motivating discussion is worth comment. I do believe that you ought to publish more on this subject matter, it might not be a taboo subject but typically people don't talk about such issues. To the next! All the best!!
    Hamburg gay bars

    ReplyDelete